Could be considered the type of merger at this time? British actor Andy Serkis – famous for its motion-capture performance as Gollum in Peter Jackson's trilogy and the title character in the new version – again with a dress decorated with spandex ping-pong – that represents the time Caesar's prequel.
Archive for June, 2010
Irony, thy name is Sergio "El Shaka" Vega. Vega, a Mexican singer, known for his songs about the culture of Mexican drug cartel, was killed last week, the next was on a media tour to dispel rumors of his death. During his visit, the media, Vega said a Latino entertainment site, "happened to me for years, told a radio station or newspaper, I have killed or wounded." .
Secreted in his lab for six weeks, stopping only to eat, experiment with other fluorescent screen and photographic paper, that the common element in the laboratory for documentation and time illustration.Rntgens "eureka" came shortly after he noticed his new-found beams passed through opaque objects and damaged the film below. It took a couple of weeks before the issue of world news and X-Ray has become the media sensation of the time. The French philosopher, physicist and mathematician Rene Descartes introduces x, y, z as unknowns in his famous treatise The Gomtrie 1637. Rntgen said, I saw my death.Because not know the exact nature of these natural electromagnetic radiation, called Rntgen radiographs. Howard Markel, MD of the University, professor of medicine and medical historian at the University of Michigan wrote: X-Ray was born in November 1895, when the phenomenon of electricity and electrons has become fashionable. His successors identified in 1930 and later named Pluto. In 1894, the American astronomer Percival Lowell began his search for the ninth planet in the solar system, which he called Planet X. The X-raysthe that allows doctors to look inside the human body, while the engine is still runningrepresent one of the most revolutionary advances in the history of science. But when his name is weird? The short answer is that it is really a story of connections. It is no exaggeration to say that its discovery has changed the practice of modern medicine for the body imaginable. When you have the world on the radiograph of a human being, Ms. In the years following, some preferred the nickname Rntgen Rays.Rntgen lost its initial findings published in late December 1895. More recently, X is a brand of choice for a comedic supernatural thriller series, science fiction, film and television as datethat shows.How ironicat last of this family of ionizing radiation continues to bear the mark of the Note. In order to provide symbol of unknowns with the corresponding symbols of unknowns, a, b, c, Descartes took the last point, x, for the first unknown and conserved for Y and Z for the second and third respectively.Writers by Samuel Coleridge and Lewis Sinclair William Thackeray favored the term X to describe a person, thing, agent or factor that has been unknown. In 1901 he received the first Nobel Prize in Physics Rntgen. A professor of physics at the University of Würzberg named William Rntgen played with a CRT with a thin aluminum window which allows a portion of the electromagnetic radiation to escape. Covered in black cardboard tube to protect their fluorescence, and shortly after escaping from the rafters noticed several meters on a plate almost platinum barium cyanide. The results included a radiographic shadow of a set of weights, a piece of metal, and, most famously, the bones of their wives hand and wedding ring. Long before Rntgen called the rays, however, when mathematiciansand scientistsused the letter X to describe a stranger. Fluoroscopes Thomas Edison and other commercial buildings, carnivals used as new viewers a show like X-ray bones, shoe stores were used to measure the size of the feet, and, finally, doctors, dentists and surgeons have learned to rely heavily on the center of the diagnostic tools in its arsenal.
A comedy, perhaps?Question: Do you think that the Emmy categories (or at least the series ones) should be expanded to 10 nominees, similar to the Oscars? It just seems with more channels and shows out there, there are so many deserving picks that get passed over, i.e. But in no scenario that I come up with do they not finish in the top two. And of course the biggest example is , a popular show that didn’t become a mega-hit until constant airings on USA made it so familiar to viewers that they began showing up during first-run episodes too. Which, given the way it was canceled (more a studio than a network decision), is something of a miracle itself.Question: Why is NBC pushing back to midseason? I think it’s one of their better shows, and I worry that it will be canceled because people won’t remember to tune in come mid-season. — Matt Roush: Couldn’t agree with you more that is exactly the sort of show that ABC should make a summer priority, especially knowing that it will be going up against one of the most hyped shows of the fall season in CBS’ The good news is that with the collapse (again) of the dreadful , ABC is moving into the Wednesday night 10/9c time period effective this week and, I’m hoping, for the rest of the summer. In the finale, at the Regionals, there were three teams in competition. Not sure it’s really such an uneven playing field.Question: As the new season of approaches, I have been trying to decide whether to keep watching it. If it is a budget issue, which seems to be the case, my suggestion would be to scrap the spin-off — which looked pretty terrible from the “backdoor” pilot that aired last season — and focus the financial resources on shoring up the original series. Unfortunately, the last two seasons have been underwhelming, so I supported the show’s decision to make some radical changes this season. Shrinking the cast and tightening the series are smart moves, and while I agree it takes away from the new cast for us to be distracted by the return of so many great veteran dancers — couldn’t agree more about Mark, by the way — that’s a significant part of the challenge this season. I’ve already asserted my position that if the show-runners didn’t feel some of the newly established characters had back stories worth exploring, I’m OK with that. Technically, he’s not employed by them right now during the show, but hopes to return. Yet. It only lasted one season. That and having the judges act more or less like grown-ups helps (although I wish Nigel would curb his tendency toward lecturing us and the contestants — but still, after that wretched season of , any substance is welcome). But for me, all I can feel is anger, disappointment and resentment. So far, Kent has managed to make an impact mostly due to his endearing personality, and Alex commanded everyone’s attention with his performance in the first week, but it takes more than two stars to make a compelling season of this show, and I fear the others may have too much of an uphill battle to outshine the all-stars (especially considering many of the all-stars are even better performers now that they’ve had a few years of professional experience behind them). With , I never lost faith, and was rewarded with one of the greatest final seasons of any series. In one way, it was a clever idea. Your June 20 answer to Tony’s question about the finale is prompting me to write. What I don’t understand is why the network did not want to continue the show in periodic two-hour TV movies like it did with a while back. Also, how is going to last more than two seasons? Community college is a two-year thing. The only FX show I watched from beginning to end was . Coach Taylor has always kind of had the threat of losing his job hanging over his head, and that’s exactly what happened in season three when they failed to retake the state title. I feel like I wasted more than five days of my life watching a show, just to get kicked in the jewels by Cuse & Lindelof while they are putting all four of their middle fingers in the air. Will the school suddenly upgrade to a four-year school? Or will all of the characters fail one of their classes and not graduate? — Matt Roush: With , NBC is giving it a rest because, much like CBS on Mondays, the network needs to keep introducing new shows each fall in hopes of creating new hits. Looking forward to many more debates to come.That’s all for now. (To be clear, the final season will be split in two parts and won’t conclude until 2011, to coincide with the 10th anniversary of 9/11.)To your big-picture question: It’s always a tough call to know when it’s time to break up with a series, and I’m not always aware I’m doing it until I see how many unaired episodes (or screeners, depending) have piled up unwatched, which is a sign I’ve pretty much given up. Was that girl Esparanza had Esparanza lived? And what was the event they were at? Who was the Hugh Hefner type guy? But I’m OK with the questions.The second hour did a lot of hopping around and would have been better had they shown the first hour as a stand-alone this week and bulked up that last episode some so as not to bounce around so much and made it a two-hour finale. I’ve read a lot of remarks about how she and Earl should have walked off together and all that, but I really appreciated the “non-cheese” that was the ending of . In a sort of flashback, we see Sue actually voting for her own school. The intervention in the bar where Tommy’s entire family fell off the wagon, resulting in the drunk-driving death of Uncle Teddy’s wife, was painful as it hit close to home. In the end, I think the producers along with CBS are to blame for this debacle. However, seems to be the type of show that would benefit greatly from the exposure since you don’t have to watch it in order. You disagree with me, I disagree with you (especially where Dogen and Ilana are concerned; I could barely remember their names, let alone care about where they came from). Is there any chance of this happening? Out of curiosity: If there are ever any more reincarnations, what network do you think would televise it as ABC owns part of the franchise? — Matt Roush: In case you hadn’t noticed, the networks are almost entirely out of the TV-movie business. Cop-out.I can understand, I guess, why some people loved the finale. The Tommy-Janet-Sheila shenanigans in the last few episodes made them almost unwatchable for me. Disappointment I can understand, perhaps even anger among fans who wished the show had ended a different way. When they announced an end date, I was actually excited, as I believed that the producers then had the ability to map out precisely how the last three seasons would play out: no filler, no fluff, no falling off the rails, but just stories that served the characters and the island mythology. — Matt Roush: It is impossible and usually foolish to judge any show merely from its premise, especially in the development phase. It’s not meant to be an easy show to watch. I don’t really want to say that has the market completely cornered on football dramas, but apart from this version being set in college and being high-school based, they do sound awfully similar, and I find it hard to believe that anything will be able to compete with in the quality department. I will miss having Holly Hunter and, especially, Leon Rippy entertaining me with their fabulous chemistry and nuanced performances. Otherwise, tell your story with what you have. A charming and purely entertaining show like this will only benefit from increased exposure, and now’s the time to do it.Question: I’m curious about your opinion of the finale. I just think it would make sound fiscal sense to bombard the viewers now so could also become a habit for the public by the fall season. So far, some of the changes seem to be working better than others. On Twitter, Brewster says she believes these moves are being made for financial reasons. No different from the way any sort of franchise show gets developed, whether it’s legal, medical, police, school, workplace, any other setting. There’s no guarantee this show will ever see light, and even if it does, I’m more inclined to give AMC the benefit of the doubt given its recent dramatic track record than dismiss the show for being another sports/football drama. It’s more a case of whether I’m truly engaged in the story and the characters, which is purely a personal decision. That’s probably the least of the show’s worries right now.Question: I understand the various reasons why CBS canceled . The ensuing clutter would likely make the honor of being nominated a lot less significant. I stopped watching and long before they ended for a variety of reasons. I like , but because it airs so late in the season, I forgot that new episodes had started airing and I missed the first three. It quickly became one of my all-time favorite reality competition shows, and after , the show I look forward to most every summer. The focus on a college team makes me think it could be more adult in tone, not unlike ESPN’s short-lived NFL series back in 2003 (which might have lasted longer if ESPN hadn’t caved to outside pressure). didn’t really seem to catch fire ratings-wise until it repeated last summer. However, like , we aren’t dealing with “real time” when we’ve got an Angel like Earl and a God is a dog with a big tongue hanging out of his mouth! I found Grace’s final act to be “so Grace.” Sacrificing herself to try to stop evil from touching those she loves — it was who Grace was to me. And once they started downhill, it just picked up speed (other than “Ab Aeterno,” which was the best episode of the season, and perhaps the series, and it wasn’t even about a “main” character). But I feel their presence has also made it harder for me to connect with any of the actual contestants. The way they contrived this was pretty clumsy and confusing, to be sure. And I have never been more excited about a season of TV than I was for this last season of . I missed your thoughtful analysis. This is their chance to take the spotlight, and the better they are coming in to the competition makes for a better show. has been a wonderful experience, regardless of the way the industry largely ignores it, but that shouldn’t preclude anyone else from telling their own story — and yes, being a TV series, it’s going to need to balance its football stories with personal subplots, that’s the way it usually works. It isn’t the darkness of any particular show that turns me away. I forced myself to make it to the lurid end of , because I wanted to be specific about my disappointment in a show I had once championed. I’m not a religious person by any means, but I really loved this show. In two weeks of performance episodes, I know my eyes haven’t drifted from Mark whenever he’s dancing, and when his partner ended up in the bottom three last week, I honestly couldn’t form an opinion on whether or not she deserved to be there since I hadn’t really watched her dance at all. There have been several points along the way where I’ve become exasperated by either the show or by Tommy for their various excesses — and I agree the Janet/Sheila triangle is one of the most exasperating — yet I find the show on balance still to be very entertaining and compelling, and that remains the case in what I’ve seen so far this season. In the last episode, I found myself wanting Tommy dead and put out of his misery once and for all. It’s up to the new dancers to project their personalities into their dance and force us to pay attention. If were to have an afterlife (so to speak) as a series of TV movies, I’d think the best place to sell such an idea would be to cable. From your standpoint, it all makes for great drama, but for some people who bring certain life experiences to the couch when they watch a show like this, it just goes too far for the show to remain enjoyable or satisfying. The judging subplot was the season finale’s weakest link and doesn’t really hold up to scrutiny, as your questions rightly point out. . Then it became a habitually viewed show by fall. After skipping the show’s fall season, I returned with renewed enthusiasm knowing I would get a chance to see old favorites like Mark, Anya, Pasha and Courtney again. And four judges (although why Olivia Newton-John agreed to play herself and come off like a jerk is beyond me), and why they would let one judge be from a school IN the finals (Sue) is a mystery. ABC should learn a lesson from two hits on CBS. But even when they can’t, having the “all-stars” on board guarantees there’s always going to be something electrifying to watch.Question: I love , but I’m very puzzled as to how a professional dancer, Alex, who is with a ballet company, is allowed to compete with the rest of the folks. I knew going in that there was no way they could answer everything, and I was OK with that. Selfishly, though, I’ve always been a Paget Brewster fan (up until this role), so am happy to know she’ll be back on the market and could end up on a show I’d be more likely to watch. (If anyone can do the math and explain the judging, or why there were only three teams apparently competing, send me an e-mail or go to the Comments area.) I even thought the way they shot Sue reading the results was suspicious, as if she were throwing the competition one way or the other. Sue being a judge is just the sort of ridiculous plot point that you either accept willingly or let it ruin the show for you.Question: I was surprised to read that AMC is developing a football drama centering on a football coach pressured to turn his team around or be fired. It is the final season, and I am certainly curious to see how it ends. But with more distance of time and reflection, I’m even more puzzled by any feeling that Team Darlton was being “mean-spirited” or giving fans the metaphorical finger in the way the finale played out. I understand that truly serialized shows do not repeat well and do not make financial sense to rerun. (Whether can overcome its thin one-joke premise remains to be seen.) Far from burying , NBC can focus some promotional muscle upon its return, whenever that happens, more than it could if it were just part of the returning fall lineup. Like most of NBC’s Thursday comedies, isn’t exactly a hit, but this hiatus doesn’t mean the network is giving up on it. Even through some missteps, it was always fun, engaging, moving, interesting and intellectually satisfying. Therefore, in the worst-case scenario, Vocal Adrenaline gets three votes to their one, and they finish second. Loved it from Day 1. I don’t miss Mary Murphy’s screeching at the judge’s table and feel Nigel, Mia and Adam give intelligent, pointed critiques that put the fools on the panel to shame. And if I had an angel, I’d want him to be just like Leon Rippy’s Earl! So what did you think? — Matt Roush: I’m not the best person to ask about this, because (referencing the question from above), I broke up with quite a few seasons ago, only occasionally tuning in to reconfirm my ambivalence. I found the first hour to be rather confusing — I wasn’t sure what the Mexico stuff was about. — Matt Roush: It’s not unusual for a long-running show to make cast changes and adjustments along the way, but it does seem especially odd for this show to be doing away with its primary female leads (excepting good old Garcia, that is, one of the few characters I’ve ever enjoyed on a show that tends to sap the life force from any actor who comes aboard). So my expectations were high, which is perhaps why I feel so disappointed.The first couple of episodes were OK. It will all depend on the casting, the writing, the execution, as it always does. But not having heard any talk of such a thing, I’d think this would be an awfully long shot.Question: Maybe I missed something, or maybe (without entering spoiler territory) you can answer a question for me. ABC could run them on ABC Family, or a deal could be struck with another outlet (Syfy would seem to be an obvious choice). Keep those questions coming to and in the meantime, follow me on Twitter at @RoushTVGuideMagSubscribe to TV Guide Magazine now!. Summer is a time for light, escapist viewing and could fit the bill perfectly. High expectations almost always come with a price, but for a show this original to go out on its own terms in this unique way still seems to me quite breathtaking and audacious. Like you, I don’t need to have my shows tied up in a neat little bow, and the end of was not a neat little bow by any means. I agree with virtually everything Tony wrote, except for his appreciation of the finale, which I felt was one of the biggest cop-outs in TV history (I’m only 32, so judge my comment accordingly). After hearing several co-workers (who watched the show more consistently) discuss the finale with varying degrees of confusion and contempt, I decided to give it a look and found it just as incoherent and unsatisfying as they did. It all seemed so heartfelt to me. Again, welcome back, and thanks for listening. We’ll be debating for years, I’m sure. — Matt Roush: I kind of expected a more vociferous “Really?” response when asked us to take such a leap of faith at the end. Regardless of their history, these are all more or less undiscovered and unheralded performers where the viewing public is concerned. One of the best attributes of is that it requires versatility not just in technique but in performance style, and even Alex admits he has a lot to learn (as the faux-Fosse routine reminded him and us). Do you ever get to a point where you just can’t keep watching one of these dark shows or do you feel obliged to your readers to keep watching so you can keep writing about them? — Matt Roush: I would imagine that Denis Leary, Peter Tolan and the rest of the creative team would take your discomfort as a compliment. That said, last season left me completely burned out (pun intended). Kent can do it, and so can a few of the others. I’m not having any second thoughts about sticking with at this point.Question: I know you’re not a fan of but I was wondering what your thoughts are about the situation with the producers’ decision to write AJ Cook out of the show and reduce the number of episodes for Paget Brewster. (And that’s before we knew which team she had voted for.) Your interpretation is right on, though, that the show at this point needed for New Directions to take a loss and be seen as underdogs again as they go into season 2. — Matt Roush: I’m not entirely clear on the eligibility rules for this show, but where Alex is concerned, his professional training and background don’t guarantee anything. It would be even worse at the Emmys, which already splits the series candidates into drama and comedy, giving a dozen shows (6 for each these days) a chance to break through. You expect us to care about the characters (and we did), and you go to great lengths to show us the before, during and after-island lives, but then you want us to ignore other characters. As bitterly disappointing as it is to see shows like be neglected year after year, I’m not sure that the flaws in the nominating system would be remedied by opening up the drama category to even more nominees. I personally believe CBS should reward the show’s loyal fans with given them/us some closure and possibly more. Nothing wrong with that. They were wonderful together! Why neither actor has won an award for their work here, I’ll never know. Even CBS, with its franchise and occasional movies, has no regular outlet for the format these days. I don’t see it happening at the Emmys — although I’m sure the networks, who feel so disadvantaged going up against cable series with less content restrictions, would like the playing field to be either expanded or leveled.Question: I am surprised that ABC has been relegating repeats to the dead zone of Saturday nights. She lived a hedonistic life, but she was nothing if not profoundly faithful to her love of her “chosen people.” And her dog! I cried, but I was happy with the way it ended. I’ve seen Melinda perform professionally in a number of New York concert venues, but that experience clearly isn’t helping her connect to the TV audience. Perhaps my expectations got the best of me, but I don’t think so.Know that I am not complaining that every mystery didn’t get solved, that is not my complaint. I feel bad for both actresses as they obviously didn’t see this move coming. Then things started going downhill. Whether you liked the way the island story or the sideways story turned out, there was a definite ending, and for that I’m grateful. How are you enjoying the return of the all-stars, and do you think this was a wise move for the show? — Matt Roush: The jury’s probably still out on the effectiveness of the “all-star” twist, but for the most part, I’ve really been enjoying this season, and the pleasure of watching the “all-stars” in action is part of the reason, I’m sure. I even gave up on . So you know the range of mail I got on this, here’s what a viewer named Dennis had to say about it: “Was there ever a worse final series episode than the final ? What was the point? Why did they do it? I don’t understand.” It all felt very rushed and ridiculous to me, but the fact its fans are debating it tells me it struck a nerve on its way out. Where ‘s long-term future is concerned, real-world rules probably don’t apply, and if this wonderfully silly show is lucky enough to survive its second season — going head-to-head with CBS’s transplanted is not going to be pretty — I imagine they’ll find some kookily contrived way to keep these misfits hitting the books or otherwise stuck in Greendale limbo. So what gives? Were they robbed? Did Josh Groban who said he liked them at first and really liked “the dark-haired girl” (Rachel), vote for them as well? If Sue saw the light and voted for her own team, why did she let the switch go through? Do the writers plan to rectify this next season and say what really happened? Or is it all some ploy to perpetuate their reign as supposed “losers” so they can get even more psyched to take the title next year? — Matt Roush: With the devil is in the details, and it’s probably better not to dwell on them. At least when had the dream sequence reveal, it was a comedy, so it didn’t feel like the producers giving their audience a mean-spirited middle finger.My issue with your response to Tony is this: If you are going to introduce a character in the last season (Dogen and the dude from ) or next-to-last (Ilana and her team), you better (a) have a good reason and (b) explain their story. Or: VD (nice touch) gets two votes and the other two schools split one apiece, in which case they for runner-up. The main reason I’m addressing it now is to caution against the natural tendency to pre-judge anything.And now, our weekly round of debate:Question: Welcome back to the TV Guide website. Sorry for the length, but this will be cathartic for me.Let me start by saying that I was a fan. Really? There are no consequences for anyone? It just feels like a show that had some gravitas and weight ended with an absolute whimper. I’m still not a fan of the bigger stage, but in the second week of competition episodes, it appeared as though the dancers were trying to use less of the space and recreate some of that intimate feel from the old set.However, one aspect of the show’s new format that I just can’t make up my mind over is the use of the rotating “all-star” partners for the top 11. My emotional investment was pointless, because everybody dies and ends up happy together. Expanding the nominees would also be great press for the shows themselves Your thoughts? — Matt Roush: I wasn’t a big fan of the Oscars rule change, being of a mind that it dilutes the best-movie category to open it up to so many contenders, which ultimately results in populist pandering. The risk was in being so hopeful in its vision of an afterlife, so unabashedly emotional in its payoffs as the characters reconnected and remembered the things that actually happened on the island, events that actually did matter. My complaint is that the last season made it clear that nothing mattered. And thanks for the welcome back. Do you see AMC having success with this project? Certainly they will promote it better than NBC has ever done for , but creatively nothing about it makes me all that curious to see how it will turn out. Plus, because making the show 100% football would never work, they are going to have to explore the lives of the players and those around them, also something has done exceptionally well over the course of its run. I was never convinced, intrigued or entertained by the show’s forced blend of sanctimony and shock value, and while I admired Holly Hunter’s gusto, I also found it incredibly self-indulgent. Putting forward new characters to solely serve plot on a series like is disingenuous. Please send all questions to [email protected] and follow me on Twitter at @RoushTVGuideMagQuestion: A couple of summers ago, I gave a shot, based partially on your glowing praise for it.
The Boy Who Lived lived through so much during what should have been his final year at Hogwarts, and you can see it in Daniel Radcliffe’sworld-weary eyes. Beyond that, I daresay this trailer actually managed to live up Warner Bros.’s decidedly un-British ballyhooing about the series being a “WORLDWIDE PHENOMENON” and this two-part finale being “THE MOTION PICTURE EVENT OF A GENERATION.” We caught glimpses of Harry’s tussle withVoldemort’s snake Nagini, the flight from the Dursley’s, the Battle of Hogwarts, Harry and Voldemort’s final showdown, and, whoops, yep, the goosebumples are back just writing about it. First impression: Our dear Harry looks like an and not just physically.